Blog Prompt: Final Thoughts

Hi All,
This is the simplest blog prompt of all. In 150 words or less, please write a post that sums up what you learned and/or what you found provocative or interesting (or puzzling or frustrating) about our conversations in MLS 590 over the course of the term. I look forward to your responses

Blog Prompt: What is the most interesting thing you've learned so far in your research for your final project?

OK. This prompt is simplicity itself. Please write a short (100-150 word) post describing the most interesting thing you've learned so far in your research for your final project.

Blog Prompt: From Nobody to Somebody

As we discussed in class last night, given the grim nature of the social, political and economic realities Hill discusses in his book Nobody, it is surprising that he ends on upbeat and positive note, celebrating the ability of protest and grassroots mobilizations to transform the vulnerable into a powerful political force, into "somebodies."  Yet, Hill makes no real positive policy prescriptions here other than saying that the State should cease harming the very (Black, Brown, poor, queer, trans) people it should be protecting. This is a very general, very vague demand. Thus, Hill's argument left me wondering about what sorts of concrete steps (policies, laws, reforms) should be taken to address the causes of the vulnerability and State violence he so ably chronicles.  What should be done to address the concentrated poverty, chronic lack of jobs and political disempowerment of a communities like Ferguson, MO and Flint, MI?  How should police practice be changed to improve relations between cops and young Black men? How should our draconian

drugs laws and the criminal justice system as whole be reformed? How do we reverse the trend towards mass incarceration (and, perhaps, how do we make incarceration itself a more rehabilitative experience)? What should we do about the epidemic of gun violence, especially in communities of the vulnerable? I'm not expecting you to answer all or even any of these questions. But I would like to know what you think.   

Blog Prompt: The Media, Real Women and Gender Oppression

In class on Tuesday, we discussed Susan Douglas' criticisms of the ways the media-- from the news to TV and film to pop culture-- promotes what she calls "enlightened sexism." Increasingly, the media feature images of women and girls as "empowered" and as in positions of power and authority. Films and TV shows these days are full of female lawyers, doctors, police detectives, Presidents, Vice Presidents and so on. Yet, as Douglas puts it toward the end of the book, 

Now, in real life, things are not quite so egalitarian as they may seem in the fantasy realms of our nation's small screens. With the media's eagerness to present "aspirational" shows and characters-- meaning viewers will fantasize about moving up and so will be in a good frame of mind to think about buying Estee Lauder "Teint longue tenue" or a Cadillac-- most  "real women" and what they do in "real life" are erased in favor of fantasies of power, achievement and control. (p. 279)

This observation raises an interesting question: Are there any representations in the media, whether fictional or journalistic,  that adequately reflect the real lives of real woman and, most importantly, that expose and draw attention to the lack of gender equity in American society? Are there TV shows or films or documentaries that manage to throw a critical light on the ways women continue to be oppressed in our society? I look forward to your posts.

 

Blog Prompt: Changing the World One Click at a Time?

In class this week, we spent a lot of time discussing the debate over just how useful social media is for social activism and activists. While critics like Malcom Gladwell acknowledge that social media is a useful tool for forging and maintaining "weak connections" and disseminating information among large numbers of people, they contend it is not particularly useful for the sort of activism that is needed to produce meaningful social and political change. Yet recent events-- the rise of Black Lives Matter, the Women's March on Washington-- suggest that online connections can mobilize people to take to the streets in huge numbers and can move people who have never engaged in activism or politics to get involved. What do you think about the role played by social media in contemporary social movements and activism?  

Please post one of your op-eds on your blog for classmates to read

Hi All, 
At some point after class tonight, please post of the two blogs you wrote on your own blog so classmates can read and respond to it. Thanks. SM

Blog Prompt: In 40 words or less, summarize the idea for one of your op-eds

This week I've given you an assignment to write two op-eds on topics of your choosing. As a way of "jump starting" the writing process -- and as a way of eliciting some feedback for your ideas-- I'd like you each to write a quick blog post that summarizes the main idea for one of the two op-eds you'll be writing. Can't wait to see what you're working on.

Blog Prompt: Is Polarization a Bad Thing?

One of the issues Ronald Jacobs and Eleanor Townsley address in their book The Space of Opinion is the popular fear that the sort of partisan narrative and views aired cable opinions shows are contributing to polarization:

To the extent that these kinds of narratives reinforce the partisan political identification of viewers, and to the extent that they encourage those viewers to see the opposing party as morally weak or even evil, then it becomes more difficult to organize a public dialogue built around mutual respect, trust or openness.

      While these patterns are certainly problematic and justify much of the public concern that has been expressed about the growing influence of the cable news networks, we think it would be a mistake to simply condemn the newer formats. The audience for cable television's opinion shows has different levels of knowledge and media engagement than its general news audience...(Jacobs and Townsley 238). 

What do you think? Are the "newer formats"-- the O'Reilly Factor, Hannity and Colmes, The Daily Show, The Rachel Maddow Show, etc.-- contributing to political polarization and a breakdown of dialogue and mutual respect across America's various ideological divides?  Or, does such programming actually raise the level of knowledge and the political engagement of its audiences? Could the popularity of such shows actually be good for democracy?

Blog Prompt # 3: Expert Commentary, Academic Feilds and Intellectual Diversity

Last week, we spent class talking about who gets classified as a "public intellectual" and seemed to arrive at a consensus that the people christened "public intellectuals" are often older, male and white. We could probably add that they usually work for elite educational institutions (MIT, University of Chicago, the Ivy League schools) or for elite media outlets (the New York Times, CNN, etc.). In preparation for our discussion of The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere next Tuesday, I want to ask a slightly different question about the diversity of the commentators and experts we see, hear and read in the media. In your view, what academic fields or disciplines (Sociology, Psychology, Economics, Political Science, English, History, etc.) are most well represented in the media and which tend to be less common or invisible? Also, how diverse are the intellectual or philosophical perspectives of the majority of commentators in the media? Are there certain perspectives that are over-represented in discussions taking place in the media? Are there perspectives that are under-represented or even stigmatized and actively scorned? I look forward to seeing your posts...

Blog Prompt #2: Who are the leading public intellectuals of our day?

In class this week, we will be discussing the concept of the public intellectual. As part of that discussion, we'll be talking about Posner's notorious list of the most influential public intellectuals in the American media. For this week's blog, I'd like you all to write a short post identifying the few thinkers and writers you consider to be the most significant or note-worthy public intellectuals of the present day and why. In class, we will spend some time discussing people's suggestions. Later this week, I'll post my own list. But for now, I am curious about who you identify as our leading intellectuals....

Blog Prompt #1: The Contemporary Public Sphere

Most writing about the public sphere tends to focus on the ways that contemporary public life falls short of the democratic ideals that theoretically inform it. Thus, Habermas bemoans the structural transformation of the public sphere in the era of welfare state social democracies, the decline of rational debate and the deterioration of the media from organs of public opinion to agents of propaganda. Nancy Fraser points out the way that the norms of the bourgeois public sphere as an ideology continue to obscure and legitimize class, gender and racial inequality. By contrast, Catherine Squires argues that critics -- like Dawson-- who say the Black public sphere is in decline are ignoring the diverse and lively discourse taking place in the rich variety of Black public spheres.

What do you think about the health of public life and the public sphere -- or diverse public spheres-- in contemporary America?  Do you think online platforms like blogs and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) that consume so much of our time and attention are functioning as public spheres, perhaps even as subaltern counterpublic spheres of various kinds? And, if so, are the multiple public spheres flourishing online a good thing or is this multiplicity/fragmentation helping to promote increased political polarization and conflict? 

I look forward to seeing your posts....

Introducing: Steve Macek, Course Instructor

At least a few of you know me either because you've had me as a teacher in a class at here at North Central or because you have seen me around campus. For those of you who don't know me, here is a short introduction:

I am a Professor of Communication and Chair of the Department of Communication and Media Studies here at at North Central. I teach courses on media studies, Freedom of Expression, gender and women studies and, occasionally, urban studies. This my 15th year at NCC.

Although I grew up in Lincoln, Nebraska, I did my undergraduate studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison where I majored in philosophy.  While I was a student at UW Madison, I helped to start and wrote for a short-lived magazine of political and cultural criticism  and I have written for magazines and newspapers ever since. I earned a Ph.D. in Cultural Studies with an emphasis on Media Studies from the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities in 2001 and taught for two years at a small liberal arts college in Pennsylvania, Wilson College, before being hired by North Central.

For much of my career, my academic research has focused on the political and ideological dimensions of media representations. I am author of Urban Nightmares: TheMedia, the Right and the Moral Panic over the City (University of Minnesota Press, 2006), a critical analysis of media representations of and political discourse about American cities and the urban poor in the 1980s and 90s, and am co-editor of Marxism and Communication Studies: The Point is to Change It (Peter Lang, 2006).  I have written articles about Chicago’s radical and alternative media that have been published in A.R.E.A. Magazine and in the edited collection AMoment of Danger: Critical Studies in the History of US Communication sinceWWII  (Marquette University Press, 2011).  I have also published essays on academic freedom in First AmendmentStudies and Z Magazine and recently contributed two pieces about the news media's coverage of the Laquan McDonald case to a forum on the media, the police and the city of Chicago sponsored by the online media studies journal Mediapolis.   

I am currently writing a book on the history of film censorship in Chicago and in the summer of 2014 I co-curated an exhibit on the topic, Banned in Chicago: Eight Decades of Film Censorship in the Windy City at the Museums at Lisle Station Park

Outside the classroom and the archive, my main hobbies are watching and playing soccer, cooking, travel, attending live theater and watching movies, especially foreign films (every year I attend several screenings at the Chicago International Film Festival).  I also garden, though not very successfully. I am an active member of the American Association of University Professors and am somewhat active in a variety of other causes.